The most overused figure (Nations 2009)…
In 2009 for the first time in history 2009 more than 50% of the population lived within cities
… but still true!
Source of:
economic growth,
innovation - technology - …,
but also - pandemics (!)
Increasing returns to scale
Constant returns to scale:
Decreasing returns to scale
How do they affect space?
Examples: Silicon Valley (micro-electronics), The City of London (finance), Detroit and Michigan (automobile), Seattle (aerospace), etc.
Based on Brueckner (2011)
Bounded rationality (Simon 1955, 1966)
To economise!
In other words, collocation of people and firms increases efficiency.
Heterogeneity | Differences in information, profession, culture, race, ethnicity, and economic status |
Interconnectivity | Interdependence between people, organizations, and infrastructure in networks |
Scaling | Self-similar economies of scale per capita in material infrastructure and increasing returns to socioeconomic activity |
Circular causality | Interdependence dynamics between socioeconomic activities, institutions, and services |
Evolution | Open-ended change supported by new information, investment, and collective action |
Source: Bettencourt (2021)
The Burgess model
Source: bbc.co.uk
The Burgess model
The Von Thünen model (The isolated state in 1826)
Source: Coe, Kelly, and Yeung (2019)
Why aren’t we all clustered in a huge city?
Diseconomies of scale
AKA Decreasing returns to scale
Source: Bettencourt (2021)
Central place theory
Source: Wood and Roberts (2012) adapted from Christaller (1966)
Central place theory
The core-periphery model
2 region model
Transport cost steadily fall over time
As transport cost ⟱, separation of production and consumption becomes feasible
⤇ Core-periphery
Source: Krugman and Elizondo (1996)